....September 2, 4:35 PM
 
 
   
What Spitzer Can Take From Suozzi: Fix Albany!

Eliot Spitzer and Mike Schenkler

By MICHAEL SCHENKLER

Okay, pundits are supposed to let the people decide and not say it’s over until the last poll closes – or “the fat lady sings.” Sure we don’t want an early call of a winner in New York to influence those still voting in California. So we choose our words carefully: “The presumptive winner.”

Let’s not kid ourselves; the New York State Gubernatorial election is over – “presumably.” Here we are with a Democratic Primary and a General Election ahead of us. Here we are in a State which has had a Republican Governor for the past 12 years and always has one of its three statewide officials from the “other” party. Here we are with a fifth of year still to go to Election Day and friends, it’s over.

Unless Eliot Spitzer is found in bed with the proverbial “underage little boy or dead little girl,” he is the next Governor of New York. He will be elected with a large enough margin in both the Primary and General Election that he will be trumpeted and welcomed like royalty. He will be respected; he will be feared.

He will ride a movement into office which will enable him to enact laws and make radical change. He will have a honeymoon like no other. Eliot Spitzer will ascend to the Governor’s Mansion with initial wide-ranging power and momentum.

In his previous position, Spitzer transformed an ordinary Attorney General’s office into one that captured national attention. He made change; he toppled idols; and he challenged and felled windmills. He was the Sherriff of Wall Street and the advocate for the people. He built a national rep on doing the right thing. He has ridden that rep deservingly all the way to his “presumptive landslide victory.” We approve of his performance and impending victory. He has championed many of the right causes for many of the right reasons. He has tackled the big ones and has achieved success.

Now comes the real job.

What will be Eliot’s priorities during his first days, weeks and months in office? It is during that time period that his big win and momentum will enable him to most easily topple the most mighty obstacles and right the most egregious wrongs.

Regular readers of this column know clearly where I would tell Spitzer to begin. For years I have been calling our State Legislature the 50th best – read worst – in the nation. Then a couple of years back, the Brennan Center of NYU Law proclaimed that after studying and surveying all of the State Legislatures, New York’s was the worst – 50th out of 50. No surprise to this writer or any student of government.

The almost dictatorial leaders, Democratic Assembly Speaker Shelly Silver of Manhattan and Republican Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno of Rennssalear reacted with some cosmetic changes, meaning nothing. The body continues to stand as a place where special interests, leadership control of perks, and a pathetic legacy of ineffectiveness preserve the status quo. Lack of campaign finance reform and control over redistricting of their own seats allows the same members to assure near-life terms and huge war chests as long as no one changes the rules. Surely the members who get fat on those rules are not going to rise up against leadership to demand reform. History has proven it.

Enter Tom Suozzi and his “Fix Albany” campaign. Tom is a bright, dynamic, charismatic, seemingly fearless politician. The Nassau County Exec is Spitzer’s opponent in the Democratic Primary. In any other time, in any other race, Tom Suozzi would not only be competitive, but a favorite of Democrats of good will. This time he faces Spitzer at his peak. Suozzi is not going to win but he has an agenda worthy of winning an election.

Over two years ago, Suozzi declared it was time to “Fix Albany” and ran and won with a candidate from his home Glen Cove challenging the incumbent Democrat from his own party. Suozzi has placed fixing Albany on top of his statewide agenda. He proposes campaign finance reform, nonpartisan redistricting and easing ballot access rules to provide competitive elections.

He has other priorities which are all worthwhile goals and can provide a game plan for reform of our State – a state with budget deficits and hidden debts buried in quasi public entities that will choke our children. He has targeted waste, fraud and abuse in NYS Medicaid – the largest such program in American and insists reform will reduce costs by 15 percent and deliver services faster and more cost effectively. Tom Suozzi’s priority is change, which all starts in Albany.

Tom or I could clearly lay out a plan for the “Governor in Waiting,” starting from the first-day visit to Shelly Silver to a list of reforms which the public, the press and good government groups would provide the added insurance of legislative enactment – if it were needed.

But Spitzer knows. He’s been around a long time. He’s been in Albany for almost eight years. He is bright and he is capable. Hopefully, he won’t let the bitterness of the campaign blur the contribution of Tom Suozzi.

Eliot, it’s still months away but this writer is counting on the next Governor of New York State to take office and on day one declare his first priority to “Fix Albany.” And then do it!

Good luck, Eliot.

Michael Schenkler can be reached via this contact form.

Vandal Busted By Straphanger Cell Phone

Queens Small Biz Hurt By Credit Crunch

State Senate Race: The Final Lap?

A Visit From The Mets

Nine Charged In $1.4M Mortgage Scheme

Inside The Board Of Elections: State Senate Votes Prompt Race Debate

MTA Changes Expected

Councilman Stable After Car Accident

Queens Weathers Economic Storm

Hospital Welcomes ‘Miracle Babies’ Home

Queens Law College Ranks In Diversity

Queens Arm Wrestlers Take Home Top Prizes

Second Attempt For Greener Taxis

Triborough Bridge Now The RFK

Opponents Flip On Willets Point Plan

Recount Get Underway In Tight Senate Race

Return To Jail Likely For Con Freed In Hoax

City Officials File Suit Over Term Limits

Audit Finds Water’s Edge In Too Deep

Celebs Cut Ribbon On New Garden

Liu Fixing Broken Meter Rule

New Test For 8th Graders Unveiled

Parkway Hospital Closes

 
 
Springtime for Bloomberg: Could He Carry The Nation?

Henry Stern

By HENRY STERN

Mayor Bloomberg’s donation of $125 million to fight cigarette smoking, primarily in developing countries, will certainly save many thousands of lives, possibly millions.

The gift shows the mayor’s unique ability to use his personal resources to accomplish humanitarian and life-saving purposes. This is one factor that differentiates him from the rest of the political world. In this area even the best or most well-known politicians are not able to compete.

A person with that influence and dedication will inevitably be considered for the presidency, if he wants to be. That does not mean he will succeed, but he probably has a better chance to reach the White House than he did of reaching City Hall when, as an unknown private citizen, he quietly began his mayoral campaign in 1999.

Mr. Bloomberg faces the same issue he did in his mayoral race: in which party should he compete. When he ran in New York City, he took over the moribund Republican Party and used it as his political base. The mayor, however, was twice elected on the Republican line.

For 2008 the Democratic and Republican Presidetial nominations appear to be pretty well sewed up by existing contenders or by other party regulars, so Mr. Bloomberg’s candidacy would have to be on an independent line. It is not impossible to qualify for the ballot. Ross Perot did it in all 50 states in 1992 and 1996, polling a remarkable 19,743,821 votes, or 18.9 percent of the total, the highest vote ever for a third party candidate. Many Perot votes were from people who were dissatisfied with both Bush the first and Bill Clinton. More Perotians are considered to have been Bush supporters than Clintonistas, so his candidacy was instrumental, if not decisive, in Mr. Clinton’s victory.

Ralph Nader ran for president three times, his Green Party candidacy peaking in 2000, when he received 2,883,105 votes or 2.7 percent of the national total, running on the left. The vast majority of Nader votes came from Al Gore rather than from Bush II. The Nader vote was greater than the margin between Bush and Gore in seven states including Florida where the vote totals say it with lucidity — Bush: 2,912,790, Gore: 2,912,253, Nader: 97,421, Pat Buchanan: 17,412.The electoral vote, Bush: 271 (including 25 from Florida), Gore: 266.

If he should run for president, Mayor Bloomberg would probably receive millions of votes, drawing from both parties but primarily from Democrats. His total would be reduced if it were felt that he had no chance to win. Nonetheless, the $500 million Mr. Bloomberg is reported to have said he is willing to spend would have substantial impact.

Mr. Bloomberg has certain advantages over other independent candidates — he is not crazy like Mr. Perot or ideological like Mr. Nader. Like the last third party candidate elected, Jesse Ventura, governor of Minnesota, he is a man who has been successful in his own field and is widely known by the public.

He is also likely to run against major party candidates who have negatives. For example, if Hillary Clinton were the Democrat and Rudy Giuliani the Republican, there are people who for various reasons might not care to vote for either. Such a campaign would be a trifecta for New York State, better than the subway series of 2000. That combination is unlikely to occur, but as we have learned in politics as in life, anything can happen.

Even if he is not elected president, Mr. Bloomberg will remain a significant national figure whose substantial resources are likely to be employed for the public good.

At the same time, the earthly job of running New York City has required Mayor Mike to make numerous decisions, a few of which are likely to have been in error, since even he does not claim infallibility. He must rely on the information he receives, some of which is likely to be slanted, self-serving, or inaccurate.

Unhappy events may occur for which he will be blamed, either for the occurrence itself, for his failure to prevent it, for the city’s response, or for his own reaction. That is what it is like being mayor. It is a wonderful job if one knows how to do it and cares enough to do it right.

We think it is a great honor for New York to have three presidential candidates. The three are of different religions, and represent both genders. They are all very intelligent people who have had problems with personal relationships. But haven’t we all.

Starquest@NYCivic.org

Not4Publication.com by Dom Nunziato
Michael Schenkler can be reached via this contact form.