....August 25, 5:22 AM
 
 
   
Viewing A Bizarre Race In Southeast Queens

By MICHAEL SCHENKLER

Okay, I like political contests. Nothing can get those journalistic juices going like a well-fought campaign.
But sadly, my beat in Queens, New York is one that is usually devoid of any real local contests. They’ve arranged it that way.

The Albany Legislature redistricting every 10 years to ensure incumbents’ lines of comfort, the rules of the game allowing lawyers to overwhelm non-professionals in the petition process, the inherent fundraising ability that comes with incumbency, the mailing, the staff, the name recognition and the institutional (almost blind) backing of an incumbent, leaves us Queens pundits few races worth our punditry.

With the rare exception caused by a referendum passed by the people which term limited our entire 14-member Council delegation four years back, there has been very limited interesting local action in Queens since well before most of us can remember.

In Queens, an incumbent has got to be pretty damn bad in order to be vulnerable at the voting booth – I guess there are occasional exceptions, but they are indeed hard to recall.

What has motivated this writing is one particular race where the word bizarre is indeed an understatement.
There is an incumbent who has demonstrated a new high in anti-social, irrational, offensive, incompetent behavior.
There are two aggressive South Asian challengers – so aggressive that each of them has developed police rap sheets connected with the campaign. There is the lone former term-limited Councilmember seeking to recapture his days of glory.

If you haven’t figured out the players, you don’t live in the 28th Council District which includes parts of Jamaica, South Jamaica, Rochdale Village and Richmond Hill.
But even if you don’t live there, I present for you a brief case study in democracy gone bad: Vacant and vulnerable seats can attract those ill-suited to office.
Let’s take a look at the Council District 28 race.

It is a given that the area will elect the Democratic candidate and therefore the Sept. 13 primary is the real race for office.

Incumbent Allan Jennings is off kilter. To put it gently and repeat an apropos analogy, some may march to the beat of their own drummer, Allan hears a tuba. He does not function like a normal member of society. As a result of his bizarre behavior, he has lost the support of his own party, has lost the right to participate in public matching funds and has been found guilty of sexual harassment and punished by his colleagues who, among other things, fined him and mandated anger management counseling.
Needless to say, Allan Jennings can be beaten. More importantly, Allan Jennings should be beaten – he cannot work with his Council colleagues or the Mayor, and his district therefore suffers. Women who have worked for and with him at the Council have suffered too.

The area’s growing South Asian and West Indian population has made them a political factor, including the holding of a Democratic District Leadership.

Court challenges leave the list of candidates in flux. However, it seems clear that the four strongest and best funded will be competing for the seat: Jennings, former Councilman Tom White, attorney Albert Baldeo and Dr. Robby Mahadeo. Narine Dhanpaul is also likely on the ballot.

Both Baldeo and Mahadeo are of Guyanese descent, and their competition has turned as ugly as we’ve ever seen in Queens political brouhaha. They have both been arrested and charged with criminal actions of bizarre severity.

Mahadeo was arrested on charges of grand larceny, menacing, coercion, stalking, and harassment after Albert Baldeo accused him of threatening behavior.

Not to be outdone, Baldeo, who is a lawyer, has had to hire a lawyer, and turn himself in to face charges of harassing, threatening, and brandishing a gun at Mahadeo’s wife.

The alleged behavior of Baldeo and Mahadeo raises the same ugly specter that they, like Jennings, will not be able to deliver for the district.

Tom White, the former Councilman, has not been without criticism himself. Although not implicated in the matter, almost decade- old charges have again arisen that three employees of his successful government substance abuse program were corrupt and misspent public funds. He also has been criticized for his attendance record while serving in the Council. However, as a Councilmember, White did bring home the proverbial bacon and during the period of his Council tenure, the District was the beneficiary of significant infrastructure improvements and considerable increases in city services.

On Jennings, what can one say? He has compared himself to Jesus Christ; placed ads in Asian language papers proclaiming his love for a Chinese dancer while smearing his wife; sent Valentine cards to other members of the Council whose performance he approved; alienated both sides of City Hall; and while being filmed, threw a chunk of metal at a Fox News television reporter.

Then things got worse for incumbent Jennings. The Council found him guilty of “creating a hostile work environment” after five women charged the council member with touching them sexually and subjecting them to racist and intimidating remarks. He was fined $5,000, stripped of his committee assignments, and required to undergo anger management training. Jennings has not paid his fine nor attended the anger management training sessions.

This is not a column of endorsement. This is a column to inform. It is one man’s attempt to keep the inanity, insanity and offensive behavior far away from elective office.

Former Congressman, the Rev. Floyd Flake and most of the respected elected officials of Southeast Queens have endorsed the candidacy of Tom White.

The choice in this district seems pretty clear.

Michael Schenkler can be reached via this contact form.

Stage Set For Addabbo, Maltese Showdown

Arthur Ashe Kids’ Day

Gennaro Launches Senate Bid Online

Torahs Stolen From Jewish Center

Gas Prices Fall After Summer Peak

Weprin Wants Tough Text Laws

Summer Rains

Cat Needs A Home

Queens Man is New Buildings Commissioner

Congressman Takes Office On The Road

Non-resident Kicked Off Senate Ballot

Home Repossessions In Queens Up 374 Percent

Man Charged In Brutal Double Murder

Gas Drilling Could Affect Drinking Water

Seat Sale Begins At Shea Stadium

Queens Caver Finds Holocaust Refuge

Residents Protests Persuade JP Morgan

New Bill Shuts Down Slaughterhouse

July Blast Leaves Residents Finger Pointing

Man Charged With Killing Girlfriend In Car Wreck

Flood Problems Persist After 2007 Flood

Residents Flood DEP With Questions At Meeting

Queens Celebrates A Night Against Crime

 
 
What Might Have Been – The Effects Of Term Limits

By HENRY STERN

Last week we passed a milestone in the 2005 political campaigns in New York City — four weeks from Primary Day, Sept. 13, six weeks from the runoff (if there is one), Sept. 27, and 12 weeks from Election Day, Nov. 8.
The historic significance of this otherwise relatively tranquil political season is that it is the third Election under term limits. Term limits have had an enormous impact in determining who is eligible to seek re-election. For example, if he were not being term limited out of office, Gifford Miller, at 35, would surely have sought re-election to the Council so he could continue to be Speaker while he seasoned himself for a future mayoral candidacy.
Term limits force him to challenge an incumbent mayor, or run for something else.

Virginia Fields, who just turned 60, would probably have stayed on as Borough President, an office to which she was comfortably re-elected in 2001. That would leave as candidates Fernando Ferrer, term limited out of the Bronx presidency in 2001, and currently holding no public office, and Congressman Anthony Weiner, who runs in even-numbered years, an advantage that Federal and State elected officials enjoy.

If the rivals were only Ferrer and Weiner, others would be more likely to enter the race, which could make it a more inspiring contest.

For the other city-wide positions, Comptroller William Thompson is unopposed, and he is looking to his mayoral race in 2009, which would benefit from the re-election of Mayor Bloomberg so that Thompson would not have to face an incumbent Democrat.This leads to one of the many contradictions that politics requires. Thompson must give hearty support to a Democrat (logically Ferrer) to gain Latino votes in ‘09. He has already performed this public ritual; but could hardly have done anything else.

For Public Advocate in 2005, we have a rerun of Gotbaum v. Siegel, with a new set of minor candidates. She won the runoff in ‘01 with 64 percent of a low total vote.
Assuming Betsy Gotbaum is re-elected, this will be an open seat in ‘09, and Norman Siegel will indubitably make his third try.

The list of losers in the Public Advocate primary in 2001 has historical interest.After Gotbaum’s 156,829 came four men, closely bunched: 105,976 for lawyer Siegel, 102,327 for Brooklyn Councilman Steven DiBrienza, 101,393 for trombonist and bandleader Willie Colon, and 99,904 for Manhattan Assemblyman Scott Stringer. A distant sixth and seventh were Manhattan Councilwoman Kathryn Freed (now a Civil Court Judge) and Sheila Flaxman, an audiologist. DiBrienza and Freed had been term limited out of their Council seats. However, if the two had not run, that could even have helped engender Gotbaum’s victory.

In looking at what 2005 might have been without term limits, we cannot forget the consequences of the First Term Limits Election in 2001. In that year’s mayoral race, there was one term-limited candidate, Council Speaker Peter Vallone. Had he sought re-election, Gifford Miller would never have become Speaker, and would have been term limited out in 2003. As Speaker, he got a bill passed extending his eligibility (and that of five colleagues) by two years.

Normally, City Council elections are held quadrennially, at the same time that city-wide officials and borough presidents are elected. But the Council is redistricted after each decade’s census. The results were ready in 2003, and therefore there was a mid-term election.

Since changing a past event involves changing other past events that were dependent on the first event (Cf. “Back to the Future” and other projections of time travel), it is difficult to reconstruct the 2005 mayoral election. It is possible that Speaker Vallone, having passed 70, would have run for mayor as a Last Hurrah. In that case, his son and namesake would have been compelled to wait to inherit (through election) his Council seat in 2006, rather than having done so in 2002. The succession could take place even later — look at Prince Charles.

Henry Stern: Staquest@NYCivic.org

Not4Publication.com by Dom Nunziato
Michael Schenkler can be reached via this contact form.