....November 6, 1:59 PM
 
 
 
Transformational Figures Forge The Future

By MICHAEL SCHENKLER

Change is in the air.

More than 40 years ago when I marched on civil rights picket lines, I never could have imagined. Not in my lifetime.

We were fighting for equality of education, of jobs, of housing. We were protesting the wrongs done each and every day to the blacks citizens of our nation. We decried the inherent racism which insidiously thrived in our society.

We demanded equality for all. We believed it could happen.

And although we are not quite there yet, a black President of the United States was not an anticipated part of the program – at least not this soon.

I can’t speak for the children of the 60s, armed with their picket signs, long hair and flowers, but this sole voice can clearly enunciate that seeing a black president elected in this country was not expected in his lifetime. It was – at least once – unimaginable.

And I repeat, although we’re not yet there at the crossroads of true equality, we’ve come a long way – longer than this optimist imagined.

And now with the burdens of a country at war, a worldwide economic crisis, an abuse of the planet’s resources, a world still filled with hunger and moral atrocities Barack Obama also has the awesome obligation of fulfilling the human promise of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. that our children will indeed never again be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

And with that mission begun, many of the children of the 60s will remember Barack Obama as the transformational figure in our lifetime. His legacy can be one of dramatic international change for my generation and the generation of my daughter which he inspired to participate in the system.

We stand on the precipice of history with perhaps the most important figure of our lifetime. His election is a mandate for change.

I can’t wait to be part of it.

I can’t wait to record it.

Good luck Mr. President.



Coattails In New York

Contrasting to the upbeat and uplifting thoughts and promises in our nation’s capital, is the downbeat and depressing prospects in our State’s capital. With him, Barack Obama has swept in enough Democratic State Senators for his party to gain control of the State Senate for the first time since 1965 and with it, all three men in the room of power are Democrats for the first time since 1935.

And good Dems will tell you change is in the air. Sadly, this writer holds performance above party and has watched the dysfunctional Albany legislature fail for years. The problem was not partisan politics. The poison destroying Albany was the lure of power, position and money, and that has no party bounds. Democrats and Republicans alike, Assembly members and State Senators attracted by the big bucks of lobbyists, kept in line by the lure of lulus and member items blindly followed the scent of dollars and power. And so it will continue unchanged.

It will take more than a power shift from one party to another to reform Albany’s culture. It will take a transformational figure, and the one we elected just two years ago turned out to be attracted by the lure of high power sex and invested in ego-politics rather than reform. His replacement, our current Governor, spurred on by the largest looming State budget deficit in history, is likely to talk loudly and negotiate with a small stick yielding often to the wants and desires of the moribund legislature.

This is the moment that will test David Paterson; this is his moment in history. The prospects don’t appear to be good.



An odor in the City

And finally, as we look to Washington to blossom and Albany to muddle on the edge of bankruptcy, New York City in the midst of its worst financial situation since 9-11, finds itself government in the middle of a crisis of morals and leadership.

The Mayor, who for seven years was above the fray, got down into the self-serving gutter to lead the desperate City Council to legislate a term limit extension of four years for them all. In so doing, he for the first time since taking office has muddied himself with serving politics and the odor has led the Council to believe they no longer have to be concerned with the moral high ground.

Mike Bloomberg, viewed by many including this writer as the best Mayor in a lifetime, loomed large on the City, State and National level -- perhaps once our potential transformational figure.

But Bloomberg, who has guided the city with reason and skill for the past seven years, has led the government astray. Will this Council ever find its way again?

There are a few more weekends left to see the beautiful New England foliage. Get out of the city and breathe the fresh air.

 
 
After Extending Terms, Councilmembers Turn on Mayor

By HENRY STERN

“Beware. Answered prayers cause more tears than unanswered ones.” - St. Theresa of Avila (1515-1582).

Mayor Bloomberg has reason to consider St. Theresa’s wise words. The Council extended the term limit on city elected officials from eight to twelve years. The act is in direct contravention of Section 1138 of the New York City Charter, which was adopted by the voters in 1993, and reaffirmed by the voters in 1996 on the specific issue of barring a third term. The Council and city lawyers believe that they have the wisdom and the authority to over-ride Charter provisions, adopted by referenda, which govern eligibility for election of city officials.

Councilmembers are specifically forbidden by the Charter (Section 38) from extending their own terms, but at the time the Charter was adopted (1989), term limits were not an issue, so there is no direct prohibitory language in the Charter. Similar provisions governing elections are protected from political tampering by that Section, and it was the clear intent of the Charter drafters not to allow politicians to interfere with the election process by changing the ground rules themselves.

The dispute now goes to the courts. The U.S. Department of Justice is required to determine whether the Council action interferes with the rights of minorities. It certainly precludes additional seats for minority challengers if the non-minority incumbents, whose names are better known, are allowed to seek four more years in office. But no one can be certain of what the courts or the Justice Department will eventually do.

What Did the Self-Extending Councilmembers Do First ?

To everyone’s great surprise, the first day of the new era of emancipated Councilmembers, now free to seek third terms, ended in bitter disputes with the man who made their third terms (along with his own) possible, Mayor Bloomberg.

What is remarkable here is that the Councilmembers believe they did the Mayor a great favor by extending term limits. That is because he and his aides put so much pressure on their weaklings, swiveling a few from prior commitments. But their payoff for helping Bloomberg was extending their own eligibility by four years. If the Mayor does not serve a third term, he will be able to devote himself to the public interest with his foundation and through national activities in which he has been engaged (guns, smoking, public health, the econ-omy). He could be a great public citizen.

However, If the Council members are found ineligible to seek a third term, or are defeated in their attempt for a threepeat, their prospects will not be nearly so bright. Only a small percentage of them will pull in the $122,500 (including lulus) per year which they collected for the past seven years.

Some will go back to fighting poverty (their own, first), others will go to nonprofits. At least one should find a home in the Bloomberg administration, if he should be re-elected and she not be. A handful will return to their prior careers as community organizers. The relatively few lawyers will continue to ply their trade, unencumbered by occasional Council meetings and the need to use their partners’ names while suing the City of New York.

The silver lining is that some of the cuppies (Council urban professionals) may be elected to higher offices which will be vacated if term limits are upheld. There are eight senior elective positions in city government which will be contested in 2009: mayor, comptroller, public advocate and the five borough presidents. Some council members have already raised millions of dollars to compete for these positions.

Our suggestion to the mayor was that he not sign the term limits bill, because he would have lost his last hold over the Council members. He has saved their seats, but is already being rewarded with abuse. Those who voted with him will be accused by their rivals of being his stooges, and the frightened legislators will criticize the mayor as much as they can to dispel that image. Their primary opponents in 2009 will show them no mercy.

The Mayor had the power to bring the issue of term extension for himself, or the three city-wide officials, to the public in a referendum which he should win, because most New Yorkers value his unique services, even if they do not agree with everything he does. Let the “emboldened” Councilmembers fend for themselves. They have already begun to throw the Mayor under the bus. He should have reciprocated their courtesy.

At her press conference one hour before the October 23 meeting on term limits, Speaker Quinn said that one reason to extend Councilmembers’ terms was the good relationship they had with the mayor, and together they would bring the city to fiscal stability, etc. The relationship has already turned sour. If the Council succeeds in defeating the voters and the Charter, they will all be up for re-election and they will pander their hearts out for whatever support they can find.

StarQuest@NYCivic.org

Not4Publication.com by Dom Nunziato
Michael Schenkler can be reached via this contact form.