....April 7, 1:19 PM
 
 
   
The Political Message Of An On-Time Budget

The Assembly Chambers just after the budget passed. Courtesy, Assemblyman Jimmy Meng.

By MICHAEL SCHENKLER

It was a week of news.

The Terry Schiavo debate and the absurdity of the U.S. Congress entering such a private and personal arena took over the water cooler buzz as the week began.
The Super Bowl being awarded to New York City in 2010 if the Jets Stadium is ready provided some upbeat relief to the head-banging Schiavo debate. Then the MTA selected the Jets proposal to construct the stadium above the west side train yards, bringing the likelihood of football returning to our City into the red zone – it also moved the Olympic 2012 Dream a small step closer to reality.

The tone of the news changed as the world watched as Pope John Paul II quietly faded from life with the Vatican providing the appropriate inspiration and ritual for Catholics and all people of goodwill around the world to share.

But none of those were the most newsworthy for this news junkie.

The New York State Legislature, for the first time in 21 years, passed an on-time budget. With respect for the passing of the leader of the Catholic Church, I won’t invoke any supreme force in reacting or describing this miracle.

Actually, it was no miracle. The fact that the worst Legislature in the entire nation finally partially recognized its obligation to the people, was due to the outcry of the people and the press. We are very proud to have played a small part in condemning the Legislature, thus forcing it to evaluate and change its abysmal track record.

It was not only our cries with those of our colleagues in print, and the good government groups that reached the crescendo causing this first step towards legislative responsibility in over two decades.

There was Nassau County Exec Tom Suozzi’s “Fix Albany” movement, which demonstrated that a longtime, incumbent legislator could be beaten on the issue of Albany incompetence. But even more significant were the number of soccer moms who walked over to the soccer dad Assemblymember and criticized his and his colleagues’ performance. It was the civic leader who raised his hand at the normally boring meeting and shouted, “Why don’t you do your job?”

What really caused this first, small, positive step by the State Legislature is the most basic of all instincts: the instinct of survival.

Yes, for the first time in their awfully long impenetrable incumbencies, sitting legislators are worried that their cushy jobs could become unpleasant or be lost. The jobs which previously were easy, with no accountability, and with a set of fundraising and election rules that made them impervious to defeat, were changing. The people and press were complaining and perhaps they were no longer above the people or above defeat.

And so, it was fear that caused the members to react, which caused the “three men in a room” to react . . . and pass an on-time budget.

Not much else has changed. The “three men”-Governor Pataki, Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, and Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno—are still the only ones that matter in Albany. The reform we heard talked about has just been talk. And this on-time budget disregards the court-mandated Campaign for Fiscal Equity funding for New York City schools. There is oh, so much more work to do and so many miles more before our pathetic Legislature lifts itself out of the 20-year-long morass of failure.
But there has been a start. And we, dear reader, you and I, can take credit for it. But we must keep the pressure on. The members of this Legislature have only responded to threats against their survival.

Go to your civic groups, speak your minds, and find candidates to run.

Incumbents must be challenged. Queens Democrats must have Primaries. And as Nassau Exec Suozzi has shown, let’s find one member who continues to sing the Legislature’s praises but is truly part of the problem, and let’s together, throw the bum out.

Got the candidate?

Let me know.

Michael Schenkler can be reached via this contact form.

Vandal Busted By Straphanger Cell Phone

Queens Small Biz Hurt By Credit Crunch

State Senate Race: The Final Lap?

A Visit From The Mets

Nine Charged In $1.4M Mortgage Scheme

Inside The Board Of Elections: State Senate Votes Prompt Race Debate

MTA Changes Expected

Councilman Stable After Car Accident

Queens Weathers Economic Storm

Hospital Welcomes ‘Miracle Babies’ Home

Queens Law College Ranks In Diversity

Queens Arm Wrestlers Take Home Top Prizes

Second Attempt For Greener Taxis

Triborough Bridge Now The RFK

Opponents Flip On Willets Point Plan

Recount Get Underway In Tight Senate Race

Return To Jail Likely For Con Freed In Hoax

City Officials File Suit Over Term Limits

Audit Finds Water’s Edge In Too Deep

Celebs Cut Ribbon On New Garden

Liu Fixing Broken Meter Rule

New Test For 8th Graders Unveiled

Parkway Hospital Closes

 
 
Educrats Dealing with Cheats and Nitwits

Henry Stern

By HENRY STERN

Two recent unusual incidents involving the city’s Department of Education (DoE) have received attention and aroused concern.

Both are fairly straightforward occasions of dishonesty or stupidity by relatively lower-level employees. They do not involve disputes over educational theory, and there has been no political intervention in either case.

In the first situation, a relatively young black teacher, Wayne Brightly, who could not pass the certification test needed to receive a permanent appointment, hired his tutor, Rubin Leitner, an elderly white man suffering from Asperger’s syndrome, to take the required examination in his place.

He allegedly paid $2 for this service. An accomplice attached Leitner’s picture to Brightly’s name to create a phony ID. The scheme unraveled when Leitner scored so high on the exam that compared with Brightly’s previous scores, the difference was inexplicable. That is what happens when you engage “Rainman.”

This controversy is about what the DoE can do when the fraud is discovered. Common sense would call for immediate action: either dismissal or a 30-day suspension without pay, during which legal proceedings could be carried out to terminate the teacher’s employment. That is what would happen if such gross misconduct were found in most other city agencies under mayoral control.

However, under Education Law, there are no suspensions without pay, except for the most egregious crimes. In most cases; the agency can only take someone off the payroll after legal proceedings are completed. The process can take from three months to three years, and the matter may well end up in third-party arbitration. This is said to be provided in the lengthy and detailed contract the DoE signed with the United Federation of Teachers.

The union responds that it is the DoE’s fault for allowing the ringer to take the test. Leitner does not resemble Wayne Brightly at all, but his picture was posted above Brightly’s name. The test, by the way, was administered by the NY State DoE, not the city.

We believe that Mr. Brightly’s dismissal is warranted. The cheating aspect — soliciting and possibly coercing an elderly man into impersonation — may even warrant criminal prosecution. In addition, a person who cannot pass a test to be a teacher should not teach.

The second incident deals with a completely erroneous set of answers for a fourth grade test in mathematics which were sent by the DoE at Tweed to the schools. In addition to numerous mistakes in computation, “Fourth” (as in grade) was misspelled “Forth.”

The DoE blamed the fiasco on one of its employees, who was responsible for producing the test. But, clearly, either the answers were not checked by the educrats at Tweed, or the answers were performed by an employee who is so mathematically challenged that he could not answer questions designed for a 9-year-old.

If this blunder had taken place in a private company, heads would roll. But since it happened at the DoE, the only result of this snafu is that a letter of reprimand will be placed in the personnel file of an employee whose identity has been concealed, lest he or she be outed as a dunce.

There is more to this story than has been published so far. We call for full disclosure by the DoE How can they be trusted as testers if they don’t check their own work?

The other oddity is that the penalty for this apparent gross incompetence is simply a letter of reprimand in one’s personnel file, which doesn’t cost an employee five cents. If such numerous and ridiculous mistakes were made by Education employees, the penalty should be much more serious: if not dismissal, a substantial fine, suspension, demotion or transfer to a much less responsible position. It is also wrong to scapegoat one individual, however lightly, for an error in oversight or computation which was in all likelihood made by a number of people, unless the department relied on only one person, which was a great managerial error.

Why are we so concerned about a situation of ineptitude which has such comic aspects? It is because many people are concerned that what happened here is symptomatic of a certain lightness in other areas of the department’s work. How can people lead children to excellence if they can’t do fourth grade math?

At least this bungle can’t be blamed on the UFT, unless the errors were made by UFT members who are relatively immune from punishment. That could happen if the disciplinary process that Tweed would be required to enter into would reveal more dirty linen than anyone wants to hang out to dry.

These two incidents are not the fault of Chancellor Joel Klein. If anything, they reveal the difficulty of the task he has undertaken. But he should take the most vigorous action he can in both cases. He has no duty to protect the cheats and nitwits who have brought shame on the efforts of dedicated people.

Most New Yorkers, including us, are rooting for the success of the school system. Why do they make it so difficult for us to hold the torch?

Henry Stern: starquest.nycivic.org

Not4Publication.com by Dom Nunziato
Michael Schenkler can be reached via this contact form.