....February 22, 2:44 PM
 
 
   
The Makings Of A New Iron Chef

By MICHAEL SCHENKLER

This column, the column below and the diet of political pundits have been dominated recently by a new recipe in Albany. Those of us who nibble and chew on local politics for fun or profession have been absorbed by the reform menu and the highly-spiced side dishes served up by a governor and his nouvelle political cuisine.

Eliot Spitzer has entered the kitchen waving cleavers and cooking with jalapenos, serving up entrées to a State Legislature that cannot stomach change.

The Legislature has spent the past decade plus dining on food prepared in kitchens of lobbyists, contributors and special interest groups. Their Executive Chefs, Bruno and Silver, controlled each and every ingredient and told the legislators how much to eat and when. And now, when being offered some creative items from a reform menu, the members are fearful that digestive systems, fat-laden and accustomed only to pablum-like flavors, may not be safe at the table of the new governor.

Now, the food metaphor can go on, but the recipe is pretty clear. The public deserves the very best. For years the public has gotten the very worst. The worst legislature in the 50 states has merely talked of reform while they fattened themselves with self-serving practices. Their talk of reform resulted only in cosmetic changes.

The people have been heard and Eliot Spitzer is the instrument of change. No, Spitzer is not perfect. And perhaps, the initial diet he offered was a bit too spicy. But his diet of reform is what the people want.

The overriding issue is simple: each and every action of an elected official must be dictated by what is in the best interest of the people. Clearly, years of self-serving redistricting, secretive member items, out-of-control campaign contributions and finance laws, lobbyist influence and institutional structure has served its leaders and members well-but not the people.

Eliot Spitzer has come offering change. He has not done so with the politeness expected by many. But when a body is so hardened by its diet of fat, extreme treatment may be called for. The State Legislature, Shelly Silver and Joe Bruno have only given change lip service when asked nicely. They have been pretenders to reform and have continued to fail the people.

While Spitzer must still run the government – his budget and programs must be passed and his appointments approved – his overriding mandate is to bring change to the Albany culture.

Spitzer has started stirring the pot. He has tossed in some very hot peppers. He has caused acute upset in the staid digestive system of the Albany status quo. His ingredients are different; his techniques radical.

His kitchen contains the finest ingredients, passion and flair typical in the top kitchens of this nation.

Spitzer is cooking.

And like the new hot TV show Iron Chef America, he is in command of his kitchen. With a no-holds-barred attitude, he has set out to revolutionize the Albany kitchen and bring respectablility back to the legislative dining rooms.

We sit and watch with gusto as he chops and dices and heats things up with aromas the State Capital has not experienced in decades.

At the end of the day, we believe his meal will be served up to rave reviews, changing the kitchen and culture of Albany and ulitmately nourishing the people of the state.

Your legislator has the opportunity to experience the new tastes or continue to play obstructionist.

We only hope that we all don’t get too hungry waiting for the main course.

Michael Schenkler can be reached via this contact form.

 
 
Is Governor Spitzer Crazy, Or Crazy Like a Fox?

Henry Stern

By HENRY STERN

The war between Governor Spitzer and the state Legislature has broken out, and opinions differ as to whether the new governor is simply crazy, or crazy like a fox.

The last time a legislative leader was dumped was in 1994, when Governor-elect Pataki made it clear in December that he wanted a new Republican Senate leader. Incumbent Ralph Marino of Oyster Bay had treated Mr. Pataki harshly during his single state Senate term, albeit with some cause, as Mr. Pataki had opposed the leadership’s proposed budget.

Mr. Pataki was chosen to run against incumbent Governor Cuomo through the influence of Senator D’Amato, who believed an attractive, well-educated, pro-choice upstate Republican could be elected. When Mr. Pataki won, he and Mr. D’Amato installed Joseph Bruno of Rensselaer as Senate leader.

Twelve years passed, regime change occurred again, and the new Democratic governor, Eliot Spitzer, 47 years old, is highly dissatisfied with the Democratic Assembly speaker, Sheldon Silver, 62, and the Republican Senate leader, Mr. Bruno, 77.

There are, however, several differences from 1994. First, Mr. Silver supported Mr. Spitzer from the start, and there are no political scores to settle. Second, Mr. Silver was recently re-elected Speaker for two years. Third, friction between the governor and the Speaker developed because Mr. Silver stood up for the Assembly by electing one of its members comptroller, despite the governor’s wishes. Mr. Silver’s support for a colleague is unlikely to alienate the caucus.

The complicating fact is that, at one point, Messrs. Bruno and Silver agreed with Mr. Spitzer to choose a comptroller from the recommendations of an “independent screening panel,” which could select up to five candidates. The panel, of which two members had been comptrollers elected with less experience than they now demand, recommended only three. One cannot demonstrate that all the other 15 applicants were substantially less qualified than the chosen trio. Messrs. Bruno and Silver may have been snookered, but when they reneged on the agreement, by choosing Assemblyman Tom DiNapoli who was not approved by the panel, they became vulnerable.

The disappointed assemblymen, five of whom were applicants for comptroller, rejected the panel’s judgment. Mr. Silver was caught between his caucus and the governor. He went with his caucus, which had elected him speaker.

The governor then declared that Mr. DiNapoli was “totally and thoroughly unqualified” to be comptroller, a position he has since modified. He vowed to go into each district to defeat Assembly members who supported Mr. DiNapoli. He flew to Syracuse Saturday to denounce Assemblyman Bill Magnarelli. Monday he was in Westchester, attacking Assemblyman George Latimer. Further forays are foreseen.

Mr. Latimer’s response was plaintive: “I’m an assemblyman, I’m not a senior guy here. I have no lulu. I have no dough in my campaign till. If someone wants to come around and squash me, I’m a little guy. I’m just doing what I think is right.”

Several issues are involved in this power struggle. One is that state legislators generally vote the way their leaders, or their caucus, direct. Individual legislators would not make many decisions on the merits, even if they knew what the merits were. Their decisions are with whom to side. They usually support the one with the power to harm them most. In the past, that has been the speaker, who sets their lulus — substantial additional salaries, theoretically in lieu of expenses — ignores or approves their bills, passes or kills their member items, or redistricts them out of office.

Many have blamed the governor’s personality and background, variously terming him as arrogant, proud, an Ivy Leaguer, and wealthy through inheritance. He may be all that, but so was Franklin Roosevelt, who governed New York between 1929 and 1932. A frequent critic of Tammany Hall, Roosevelt was set to remove New York City Mayor Walker, when the mayor suddenly resigned and sailed to France.

Governor Spitzer wants to be the Alpha Male of Albany. If he had acceded to Speaker Silver’s decisions, he would have been just one of “three men in a room.” Triumvirs cannot rule if one is an 800-pound gorilla symbolizing overwhelming power. What Mr. Spitzer is trying to show is that legislators should fear him defeating them in a 2008 primary more than they worry over whatever damage Mr. Silver may inflict.

A Quinnipiac poll Tuesday showed great public support for Governor Spitzer, and wide disapproval of Messrs. Bruno and Silver. This will influence legislators who go with the wind. But will they escape their current bondage unless they know that fealty to the governor will keep them safer than loyalty to the Speaker?

The Spitzer-Bruno and Spitzer-Silver conflicts are equally intense. The Senate has the power to confirm or not the governor’s appointees, as well as to approve all laws and the state budget. The party division there, however, is much closer, 33 to 29, with only two switches needed to change the majority to Democratic. The governor will do his best to bring that about.

He may be assisted by law enforcement. Leaked stories have accused Mr. Bruno of far more serious misconduct than Alan Hevesi’s. If the leaks are true, felony indictments will come this year. Were Mr. Bruno’s seat vacated, a special election would follow.

If Mr. Spitzer vanquishes both the Democratic and Republican leaders and succeeds in changing New York State government for the better, he will run for president in 2016, or in 2012 if the Republicans win in 2008. He knows that, and is acting accordingly.

StarQuest@NYCivic.org

Not4Publication.com by Dom Nunziato
Michael Schenkler can be reached via this contact form.