|
|
| |
Pagan Republicans & Other Apparent Anomalies
|
| Dan Halloran performing a pagan ritual; but are the other heathens registered Republican…?
|
By PAULINE PARK
William James wrote of “The Varieties of Religious Experience” in 1902, long before the movement now known as ‘neo-paganism’ came into its own. While I am not aware of any survey data on the matter, I suspect that most people, if asked, would probably imagine such modern pagans to be on the left of the political spectrum. So it may come as a surprise to the voters in the 19th New York City Council District — one of the most conservative in Queens, which includes Bayside, Whitestone, Auburndale, Flushing North and other neighborhoods on the northeastern fringe of the borough — to discover that the Republican nominee for City Council in their district identifies as a pagan.
When the Queens Tribune discovered that the candidate who now has the Republican, Conservative, Independence and Libertarian Party lines going into the November general election, also styles himself ‘First Atheling’ of a local group of self-identified ‘heathens’ dedicated to the worship of the old Norse gods, the weekly newspaper dubbed Dan Halloran the ‘pagan king.’
Halloran’s campaign website gives one the impression of a boilerplate tax-cutting Republican. There’s certainly nothing to indicate that the Irish American who was raised Catholic is a pagan, much less the lawyer for the New York City Pagan Pride Project. From his responses to questions from the Queens Tribune, the conservative Republican seems slightly embarrassed to have gotten media attention for his paganism, and there’s no link on his campaign website to his profile page on paganspace.net, where he calls himself ‘Dan-O’ (‘O’Halloran’ apparently being the traditional Irish version of his family name). Halloran is certainly the first Republican candidate for public office I’ve ever come across who lists ‘heathenry’ as one of his hobbies or who claims to be the ‘first atheling’ (leading prince) of a local band of Norse pagans.
Halloran’s belief system — ‘Theodism’ — is defined by The Witches’ Voice as “a heathen orthodox approach to Germanic reconstruction.” I suppose if one is going to run as a heathen Republican, it is probably best not to stray too far from heathen orthodoxy; if one does, one risks the wrath of people with names like ‘Swain Wodening’ and ‘Gert Thygen McQueen.’ But Halloran’s more recent concern has been less the anger of the Thaet Angelseaxice Ealdriht than the displeasure of the barons and thanes of the Queens County Republican Party organization. After rumors that Halloran might get the axe — wielded no doubt by the decidedly post-Norse, conventionally religious party boss Phil Ragusa — Halloran’s spokesperson insisted that the candidate would not be offered a judgeship or pushed aside in favor of Paul Vallone (scion of former Council Speaker Peter Vallone, Sr.), who had just lost the Democratic primary in the 19th to Kevin Kim. So apparently the “GOP is standing by their Theodsman,” as one neo-pagan blogger put it.
“What we [the Queens County Republican Party] have done is stand firmly with Dan Halloran and called on Congressman [Gary] Ackerman and his staffer Kevin Kim to renounce the vile, repugnant attacks on Dan Halloran’s faith and heritage,” Vince Tabone (Queens executive vice-chairman and spokesperson for the Halloran campaign) was quoted as saying. Tabone’s tone of moral indignation might have more credibility if there were any indication on Halloran’s website or in his campaign literature of a commitment to diversity of religious and spiritual expression or any history of the Queens County Republican Party’s commitment to such diversity. Certainly, the national Republican Party has been the instrument of the religious right from 1980 to the present day and its intolerance for any form of religion except Christian fundamentalism of the most bigoted sort has had a profoundly negative impact on this country for more than a generation.
While Dan Halloran would be the first pagan-identified candidate that I am aware of to win elected office in this city or anywhere in the state, the fact is that he was not running as an ‘out and proud’ pagan. Halloran was ‘outed’ by the Tribune and has seemed sheepish in trying to defend himself, saying simply that his religious faith should be kept out of the race — not at all the response one would expect from someone who cites Beowulf as one of his heroes. Perhaps Halloran could more effectively rally the neo-pagan vote in the 19th district if he were more stout in his defense of his Theodic faith. But the 19th is not, as far as I am aware, a hotbed of heathenry; in fact, it is one of the most socially and politically conservative Council districts in New York City and one of the few in which Republican candidates are viable, so Halloran does have a good chance of winning the seat being vacated by Council Member Tony Avella, who on Sept. 15 lost the Democratic primary for mayor to Bill Thompson.
Whichever candidate wins, he will be making history. The high heathen Halloran will face Kevin Kim in the general election in November, as Kim won the hotly contested Democratic primary on Sept. 15. The deputy director for community affairs for U.S. Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-5), Kim has his boss’s support, and if he prevails in November, he would be the first Korean American elected to public office in the borough or the city. Kim’s candidacy takes on added significance, he is the only viable candidate for City Council of Korean descent, and on November 3, the voters of the 19th district will determine whether a Korean American takes office for the first time in the history of the city or the state.
I live in the 25th Council district in western Queens, which seems a world away from the 19th in ambience and political culture; but if I were a voter in the 19th district, I would certainly vote for Kevin Kim, whose politics are clearly more progressive than Halloran’s warmed-over right-wing Bush Republicanism. Kim is my atheling of choice.
Pauline Park, a resident of Jackson Heights, has been active in citywide politics and LGBT advocacy since 1997. She blogs regularly at paulinepark.com, where this commentary originally appeared.
|
|
|
| |
Who Won It for Liu? Warning On WFP
|
| Henry Stern
|
By
HENRY STERN
Recent articles reflect the rising influence on the Democratic Party of the Working Families Party.
It is said that victory has a thousand fathers, while defeat is an orphan. In the case of John Liu, two of the fathers seem to be at odds. In the Post, we read: Liu Aide Whacks Lax WFP. Says Party Was MIA: “A top adviser to John Liu’s campaign for city comptroller said yesterday that the labor-backed Working Families Party is getting credit it doesn’t deserve for his history-making win. The adviser described the party’s role as ‘tangential.’
“The bottom line is, the WPF made a lot of promises and they didn’t keep any of them. . . Once they couldn’t run the whole show, they basically took their marbles and went home,” the source told the Post.
SAVE A HALF-MILLION $
A Daily News editorial, NO MONEY FOR JOHN AND BILL, is clear in expressing its wishes. “Congratulations to John Liu and Bill de Blasio for primary runoff victories that insure their inaugurations New Year’s Day as controller and public advocate. This morning, they must do their first services to taxpayers.
“Both Democrats must refuse to accept the more than half-million dollars that they are due to receive today in public campaign financing for the general election in November. . .
“It would be an obscene abuse of the public’s goodwill in funding political races were Liu to grab $350,000 and de Blasio to glom $220,000 to bankroll self-promotional TV ad campaigns while running against Republican ciphers. Their opponents are weak to the point of nonexistence. Neither has raised even the $25,000 necessary to qualify to appear in official debates.”
In our judgment, the Daily News is spot on. There are many other races, however, which are obvious runaways for the Democratic nominees. All should be scrutinized to make certain that the taxpayers are not being fleeced to permit unbeatable candidates or hapless losers to publicize themselves.
For genuine contests, the CFB performs a useful public service by amplifying the resources of the candidates to reach the public. The problem is that the current law has been misused to pay for runaways, and the kindly and honorable souls who comprise the Board have not yet devised a way to prevent this waste of public funds.
TWO AND A HALF PARTIES
A longer-term perspective on the influence of the Working Families Party appeared in a Post column by Steven Malanga: How The WFP Dooms NYC Democrats.
He writes: “The Working Families Party – an alliance of public-sector unions and social-service advocates, co-founded by ACORN chief Bertha Lewis – has taken control of the city’s Democratic Party from within. But in the process it has driven the Democrats so far to the left that the one prize that matters in New York City, the mayoralty, is further out of reach than ever.”
The WFP has influence over the Democratic Party that the Liberal Party never achieved . . . That is because, with its allies, the WFP mobilizes troops, paid and unpaid, to intervene in primaries where the vote is light. The traditional Democrats are weaker than ever, as social service agencies have taken the place of political clubs in helping to support individuals. The problem is complicated by the absence of leadership at the state Democrats’ highest levels.
What former Governor George Pataki did for 12 years in weakening the Republican Party, the absence of a Pataki, or anyone else to provide leadership, has done for the Democratic Party. What the WFP can do for the Democrats will parallel what the Conservative Party has done for the Republicans, driven them to the right and made them less appealing to independent voters, who once voted for Javits and Rockefeller on the Republican line.
StarQuest@NYCivic.org |
|

|
Not4Publication.com by Dom Nunziato |
|
|
|
|