....December 17, 5:40 PM
 
 
 
In Albany, Diogenes Searches
For An Honest Man


By MICHAEL SCHENKLER


Follow me on Twitter @QueensTribune

“Are they all bad?”

I’ve recently wondered out loud, if the members of our State Legislature are so immersed in the culture of Albany that even the best of them may be tainted. I’ve repeated this dismal suggestion to a member of the Assembly who I look at as a cut above the rest.

“There are a few good ones left,” he responded.

And so it begins to seem that like Diogenes, one must wander endlessly through the corridors of the State Capitol in search of an honest man.

We’re not necessarily talking here about criminality but acceptance of a culture of corruption — the very same culture which emboldened Joe Bruno to serve as Senate Majority Leader for years while taking huge fees and doing business with those trying to influence state government. While Bruno’s conviction is on appeal, wrong-doing is certain, even if criminality may be viewed in the gray area.

Political contributors, businessmen and lobyists appear to buy more than access in the not-so-hallowed halls of Albany.

Queens Assemblymembers Brian McLauglin and Tony Seminario are two who were convicted for clearly crossing the line. But with Albany rules and absurdly loose ethics oversight, that line has been pushed by more and more members. It is almost as if the elders or staff conduct lessons teaching the newly elected to game the system.

Many appear to learn how by doing business with lobbyists; accepting large, barely scrutinized contributions and gifts; taking fees from for those who want to influence government; accepting outside employment offered because of their elected position, all ways to enrich yourself in a system that enables incumbents to get reelected as long as they are not in jail.

This year, the winds of change that incumbents felt may blow hard in the face of some of the members of the nation’s most dysfunctional legislature. And while very few officeholders may lose their seats, a few very well may, and it is likely that there will be others besides this writer reminding the voters of the summer shutdown of the Senate and the ongoing series of improprieties by members of the NY State Legislature.

And no, my friends, for us it is not party or personality – it is that Diogenes-like search for an honest man. We seek elected officials who will cast their vote for what is in the best interest of the people of the State – you know, an honest man (or woman). Hiram Monserrate, the freshman State Senator who was instrumental in shutting down Albany last summer and was more recently convicted of a misdemeanor (and acquitted of a felony) in the assault of his girlfriend has become the latest target of those claiming they want to clean up Albany.

We wonder whether the efforts of those trying to get Hiram are more of a payback for his renegade style than his misdeeds. The State Senate has begun an Ethics investigation seeking to punish (or remove) him for his misdemeanor conviction while not seeking similar action against his colleague, Senator Kevin Parker who has also been convicted of a misdemeanor assault against an NYC Parking Violations employee and is awaiting disposition of a second assault charge against a photojournalist.

The Queens Democratic Party has many motives for trying to unseat Monserrate – one of them is clearly his abandonment of the Democratic Party caucus leading to a month-long standstill in Albany. We understand and applaud the Democratic Party’s effort to make sure their caucus in a reapportionment year is loyal. The Amigos who strayed certainly deserve to be tested in a Primary.

However, the ethics of the challenger must also be considered.

And sadly, the ethics of the challenger to Hiram Monserrate, who has been almost anointed by the Queens Democrats, has come into question – we think very serious question.

Assemblyman Jose Peralta has been, since he received Democratic Party support at their annual dinner, attacking Monserrate for his misdemeanor conviction. He has however, been difficult to reach, vague and elusive when it comes to the serious charges of his own ethical – if not illegal – misbehavior.

As reported in this paper last week, Peralta’s campaign filings listed his campaign headquarters valued at $1,300 per month, as an in-kind donation of his mother totaling $29,900. In fact the property is owned by an associate of his mother and as an LLC (corporation). While Jose’s mom could donate $29,900 in the reported period of time, the associate who actually owned the property or the LLC could only have given $6,000 year or $12,000 in total. Jose told this paper that his mother is the office manager, so he used her name. In fact by filing that false information, Jose’s campaign benefitted to the tune of $17,900. Furthermore, the same associate of his mother who allowed Jose to use $29,900 valued rent-free office space, was the recipient of rent from a community organization organized and funded by Peralta using public funds.

Peralta’s spokesperson now claims that the listing of his mother was a mistake and has not explained how the campaign accepted $17,900 more than the legal limit. Nor have we received an explanation of the campaign accepting office space from someone who was the recipient of State funds arranged for by Peralta.

Basically, it appears to stink – on several levels. It looks like Jose Peralta has quickly taken to the culture of corruption in Albany. He hopes to unseat Hiram Monserrate by claiming Hiram stinks more.

There is still plenty of time to find an honest man to take on the ethically challenged Monserrate. But to support someone who files false reports to enrich his campaign or doles out State money in exchange for financial favors, merely perpetuates the corrupt culture.

Perhaps Peralta has more information he wishes to share with this paper that may help explain behaviors that we think add to the stench of Albany and warrant serious investigation.

Perhaps Diogenes’ lifelong search for an honest man may never end in Albany.

MSchenkler@QueensTribune.com

Michael Schenkler can be reached via this
contact form.

 
 
Diaz’s Demands Prevented Agreement On Bx Armory Mall

Henry Stern

By HENRY STERN

The pot continues to bubble at the Kingsbridge Armory.

We believe that city-wide questions on economic development, as well as the scope of the City Council’s role in deciding questions of land use, are at issue in the Council’s decision to reject the proposed shopping mall which Related Companies wanted to build as a reconstruction of the long-abandoned facility in the Bronx.

Mayor Bloomberg vetoed the City Council’s rejection. The plan had previously been approved by Bronx Community Board Seven and the City Planning Commission.  The matter now goes back to the Council, which will consider over-riding the mayor’s veto at its meeting Monday.  Since its decision last Monday came on a 45-1 vote (with only outgoing Queens councilmember Helen Sears dissenting), it is expected that, unless a delay is agreed to, the necessary two-thirds majority (34 votes) will be assembled to override.

The Council decision did not mean that 45 of its 51 members had individually evaluated the proposal and found it unsatisfactory for economic reasons.  Under the rubric of deference to local officials on land use issues, the Council ratified the wishes of the Bronx delegation and Borough President Diaz.  The principle is comparable to “senatorial courtesy,” under which a senator can block the President’s nomination of an official from his home state who s/he deems unsuitable for any or no reason. 

When the impact of a land use decision is purely local, this policy has a rationale.  If a community and its elected officials do not want a park to be renovated or redesigned, it may be sensible to spend the capital funds elsewhere, rather than impose an unpopular plan on the people who will use the park or other facility.  But when the proposal has city-wide significance, e.g. the location of a marine transfer station or a facility which will serve an entire borough, it would not be appropriate to yield to parochial nimbyism.  Nimby is a well-known acronym for “not in my backyard.” Nimby’s recently sprouting cousin, Banana, reflects a negative attitude toward public improvements in general.  It stands for “build absolutely nothing anywhere near anybody.”

CONCLUSIONS & QUESTIONS
1.This situation was not helped by the city discussing offers and then withdrawing them on legal advice. But if one man is responsible for the impasse, it is Ruben Diaz.

2. The new and relatively unknown borough president of the Bronx is trying to make his bones by standing up for poor people, whether they have jobs or not. 

3. This project is at least two years in the making. The eleventh hour is not the time to demand a wage clause which is unprecedented in similar agreements. 

4. The world should not be required to change gears because BP Diaz succeeded BP Carrion. 

5. The city has a very competent negotiator in Commissioner of Labor Relation James Hanley.  He might have been helpful in this situation.

6. We hope the plan is resurrected when the parties cool off.  The Bronx could use the private investment, particularly with its 13.4% unemployment rate.

7. The whole concept of ‘community benefits agreement’ should be carefully examined to make certain that these are not political payoffs to local operators.

8. In the Yankee Stadium replacement, the Yankees dealt with the Bronx’s political leadership.  That is harder to do when the leadership is in flux.

9. The Bronx is the city’s poorest borough.  The fact that this project has so far failed is not helpful to the people who live there. 

10. If the new Council believes that it can show its strength by over-ruling the mayor, that may be correct in the short run but it will lead to difficult days ahead.

11. Does the City Council wish to emulate the bumbling clowns in the state legislature?  

12. Or do they see themselves as avatars of a populist revolution which will lead to a new social order in New York City; and if so, who will pay for it?

StarQuest@NYCivic.com

Not4Publication.com by Dom Nunziato
Michael Schenkler can be reached via this contact form.