....May 4, 5:15 PM
 
 
   
American Story: The Day Of The Immigrant Worker

Last week’s Queens Tribune cover

By MICHAEL SCHENKLER

How terrible, they sang the national anthem in Spanish.

It was a bit of rewrite expressing love, unity and respect for America. Significantly, the rockets red glare and other symbols of war were missing, but not American pride.

Our country is strong enough to take a bit of national anthem editing – especially when it promotes inclusion over war. And after all, we’ve seen singer after singer forget the existing words and few, if any, know all the stanzas.

Symbolism is cool but let’s not lose the roots of our country – the immigrant experience.

A little over a month ago, I called the Trib staff together and declared “Immigration” as the national issue of the moment. The Congressional confusion over guiding the tenuous balance between national security and our nation’s multicultural heritage and economic realities was not going away. So the staff quickly embraced the concept when I announced that “The Immigrant Issue” would be the theme of our Tribune monthly glossy magazine issue.

The timing was perfect. The issue continues to percolate through our national life and news. And of course remains the focal centerpiece of Queens, the most multicultural place on Earth.

The glossy special “The Immigrant Issue” received quite a reaction on both sides. Surprisingly, my personal email ran very much in support of my position concerning the national debate on illegal immigrants:

“My past is paved by family who came to this nation in search of a better life and no one really asked their status. Our nation is built by great Americans whose families were born elsewhere. Their hearts and souls and intellect – not their paperwork – were the embodiment of the American dream.

Yes we must protect our country. But the quality of our nation is not dependent upon tracking down the young lady with an accent who served me dinner last night.”
And as our publication, “The Immigrant Issue” was being consumed by readers, the immigrant issue continued to consume our nation and neighborhoods.

The national news was filled with stories that in reaction to some unclear reference to a Homeland Security immigration crackdown, false rumors spread throughout immigrant communities resulting in empty classrooms, workplaces and deserted streets. Fear gripped many immigrant communities which just a month earlier took to the streets in protest, and to the cameras in a high profile attempt to tell their story.

Had the tone changed?

As I write this on the last weekend of April, I anticipate returning to the office on May 1 – May Day – when immigrant advocacy groups are organizing a nationwide boycott to demonstrate just how important immigrants – legal and illegal – are to the American way of life and economy.

As you read this days after May Day – the first of May traditionally a Labor Day expression of protest on behalf of oppressed workers rights – you will have already read about the solidarity demonstrated by immigrants crying out for their piece of America.

If all went as planned, our nation was disrupted. Some trucks didn’t roll; some factories didn’t open; some hedges weren’t trimmed, some dishes remained unwashed and some classrooms went empty. Instead of business as usual, many immigrants chose to take to the streets in support of “A Day Without an Immigrant.”

The May Day protest can be traced back to the struggle of American workers in Chicago in 1886. A protest beginning May 1, ultimately led to the infamous Haymarket Riots marking May 1 as international day of the worker.

This year, in our nation, it was the day of the immigrant worker.

For some of us, their role has always been evident. Each generation of Americans was enriched by the sweat of their immigrant brothers and sisters. Those immigrants soon became the new Americans and made way for a new group to come to this nation. It has been the American story since the first wave came here from Europe in search of religious freedom – you’ve heard of the Pilgrims.

Their story is no different today: freedom and opportunity attracts immigrants to our nation. And a natural struggle exists to absorb the new population – that has been the American story – the successful American story since before our nation became a nation. The only thing that has changed, is September 11.

Yes, we must keep our nation safe. But if fear changes the American ethos, if terrorism changes the message of the Statue of Liberty, if the vile attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 alter the deepest meaning of the American story, then we have lost.

Our spirit is strong and our national experience deep. The immigrant experience is the American experience. We are interdependent.

In another decade or another century, we were them.
Welcome to America.

Michael Schenkler can be reached via this contact form.

Vandal Busted By Straphanger Cell Phone

Queens Small Biz Hurt By Credit Crunch

State Senate Race: The Final Lap?

A Visit From The Mets

Nine Charged In $1.4M Mortgage Scheme

Inside The Board Of Elections: State Senate Votes Prompt Race Debate

MTA Changes Expected

Councilman Stable After Car Accident

Queens Weathers Economic Storm

Hospital Welcomes ‘Miracle Babies’ Home

Queens Law College Ranks In Diversity

Queens Arm Wrestlers Take Home Top Prizes

Second Attempt For Greener Taxis

Triborough Bridge Now The RFK

Opponents Flip On Willets Point Plan

Recount Get Underway In Tight Senate Race

Return To Jail Likely For Con Freed In Hoax

City Officials File Suit Over Term Limits

Audit Finds Water’s Edge In Too Deep

Celebs Cut Ribbon On New Garden

Liu Fixing Broken Meter Rule

New Test For 8th Graders Unveiled

Parkway Hospital Closes

 
 
Who Should Run a Legislature,The Speaker or Members?


By HENRY STERN

Here are some observations on efforts to secure legislative reform, followed by some political history of a City Council contest for leadership and reflections on the conflict in legislatures between individual autonomy and institutional stability.

A coalition of civic groups is pressing for reform of New York State’s legislative and budgetary rules. Jo Brill of the Citizens Budget Commission is doing an admirable job of collecting and compiling proposals for reform, comments from experts, and editorials from newspapers around the state.

The election of a new governor brings stirrings of hope that, next year, public issues will be handled differently, with more emphasis on substance, fairness and transparency, and less on rewards for obedient legislators.

We recognize that honorable people, elected to serve in Albany, are ensnared in a system where the way they can be most effective is by going along with the leadership that they have chosen. They are aware that being a rebel means becoming a pariah, with no chance of influencing either legislation or appropriations. But going along involves the surrender of the ability to make choices for yourself.

We had very strong leadership in the City Council at the time I served there, 1974 to 1983. The alpha male was Thomas J. Cuite of Brooklyn, a social conservative whose title was Vice Chairman and Majority Leader. Cuite dominated the Council from 1969 to l985. He ran a tight ship, and any dissenter was required to seek his permission to “go off the reservation” on an issue. Such permission was rarely granted, and the member who defied the leader did so at his or her peril.

When Cuite retired due to impending illness and a prospective primary, Peter F. Vallone of Queens was elected majority leader by a vote of 18-17. Every vote for him was the deciding vote, but one deserves special attention.

Robert J. Dryfoos, who recently passed away had promised his Manhattan colleagues that he would vote for Vallone’s rival along with the rest of the delegation. He renewed his commitment ten minutes before the vote, but when called upon he pulled from his pocket a written statement supporting Vallone. It turns out that this switch had been plotted weeks ago in conjunction with Stanley Friedman, the Bronx Democratic leader, and Donald Manes, the late Borough President of Queens. Both men subsequently had legal issues, as a result of which Manes took his own life.

Friedman endured imprisonment, and has become a valuable member of society, which shows how different people respond to stress.

As a result of his treachery, Dryfoos was ostracized by his Manhattan colleagues, but amply rewarded by Vallone.

It was widely felt that Dryfoos had a right to vote for whoever he chose, but lying about it was vile. In fact, Vallone was probably made a more effective leader than his rival. The issue in this situation was whether Dryfoos had a moral obligation to be truthful to his colleagues. He had no legal obligation to do so; he was not under oath when he lied.

Tactically, the reason for nondisclosure of his true sentiments was that if it were known that Vallone was one vote up rather than down, there could have been an effort to pry away one of his supporters, which would have led to a different result. By keeping their ace in the hole up their sleeve, to coin a phrase, the Friedman-Manes team gained a decisive advantage. It was their last coup, a few days before Manes attempted suicide. Several months later he succeeded.

Historically, Vallone turned out to be a competent Speaker who led the Council responsibly as it gained additional budgetary powers. There was, however, not much autonomy for individual members (especially on the budget), and in that respect the Council was comparable to the Senate and Assembly. While legislative positions may be determined by party caucuses, the leader’s influence dominates the caucus. Some issues never even reach the caucus.

Reformers and editorial boards agree that the current process suppresses open dissent and reduces individual influence in the making of laws and the appropriation of funds. It is argued that strong leadership is necessary for a legislature to be effective, rather than a mess of squawlers and brawlers.

In this situation, contradictory charges are made by both the democrats and the autocrats. Rule 30-T wisely states: “The truth lies somewhere in between.” Finding that somewhere is the problem. The balance could certainly shift in the direction of openness and broader participation in the decision making process. But one must never underestimate the status quo.

Starquest@NYCivic.org

Not4Publication.com by Dom Nunziato
Michael Schenkler can be reached via this contact form.