Queens Tribune
 
....February 11, 9:23 PM
 
 
   
Rezoning’s New Challenge: College Point Next Hurdle In Battle

The Revised Zoning map for College Point was unveiled at a meeting last week.Tribune photo by Michael Rehak

By Michael Rehak

Continuing the fight against overdevelopment in Queens neighborhoods, fresh from gaining their first victory in Bayside, the fearsome foursome of Queens rezoning is setting its sights on its next victory.

The four-man team, which includes the chairman of the City Council zoning committee, Councilman Tony Avella (D-Bayside), Queens City Planning Director John Young, urban planner Paul Graziano and City Planning Project Manager Frederick Lee, unveiled their latest plan of attack last week – the rezoning of the waterfront community of College Point.

Residents of this little peninsula are the only people in Queens who have views of Flushing Bay to the west and the East River to the north. But their picturesque skyline view of Manhattan is tempered by their limited road access in and out of their predominantly suburban neighborhood.

With that in mind, a rezoning study, conducted by the Department of City Planning and unveiled last week at the landmark Poppenhusen Institute, lays out a number of changes to the zoning regulations that have existed since 1961.

What’s Changing?
The proposed changes include the new R2A zoning designation, which was created with the intent of curbing residential development in low-density areas. Before it can be certified, the changes have to pass muster with an environmental review. After that, Community Board 7, Borough President Helen Marshall, City Planning and the City Council all must sign off, though the only vote that really counts is that of the Council – the rest are all advisory.

According to Young, this process could turn the College Point zoning into law by September, with three to four months for the environmental study and an additional three to four months for the legislative review.

Avella said that College Point had always been zoned improperly. “No one can deny that College Point is one of the worst examples of overdevelopment in the borough of Queens and it has been going on for decades.” He added that public input is most important at this stage, so that any changes or additions could be made before it becomes certified.

“One of the key factors is to understand that we need to have orderly growth of development, not rampant overdevelopment, which in the short-term, for some people, is very good, but long-term for everyone – not very good,” Young said. “And that is certainly why we have been trying to work with civic groups, local elected officials, the borough president and her zoning task force to identify what areas are really threatened by rapid changes that alter their character.

The goal, he said, is to finish the rezoning process with “stable, healthy, growing communities.”

Lee, the project manager behind the rezoning, said that the 240 blocks and approximately 5,000 lots of College Point that are zoned predominately residential with a perimeter of manufacturing districts around the waterfront to the south and the east will, for the most part, remain that way.

Water Rate Hike Town Hall Meeting

FDNY Implements New Dispatch System

Two Arrested In Internet Sting

Hit-And-Run Driver Turns Himself In

Media Piracy Penalties Stiffened

Budget Halts College Services

Classic Picasso Prints On Display

Harassed Tenants Building Support

Treatment Lessens Side Effects

Youth Baseball Conflicts Queens

Mets And Amazing Schools:

City Announces Rockaway Ferry

30th Candidates Squabble Over Details

Water Board Blasted For Rate Hike

Supermarket Stiffs Baggers

Katz Has Baby Boy

New Bank Offers Loans To The Poor

Senate Approves Summer Gas-Tax Suspense

Queens Inaugurates Its Jazz Orchestra

New Treatment Battles Epilepsy

City Provides Youth With Summer Jobs

Queens Air Gets an ‘F’ Report Says

Acquittals Cap Dramatic Bell Trial

 
 

Tony Avella (l. to r.) Queens Planning Director John Young and Project Manager Frederick Lee discuss the new zoning. Tribune photo by Michael Rehak

The Bottleneck
A study by City Planning showed on paper what anybody who has been in and out of College Point has know for years – access to College Point is limited.

“The idea of creating several thousand new housing units in College Point will create some extra bottlenecks on the few access roads of 11th Avenue, 14th Avenue and College Point Boulevard that will render the area difficult in terms of traffic flow,” Lee said.

Young said that some undeveloped land that borders inlets raise some open space issues. “Out of all of northeast Queens, this is really a separate study because it is really complicated and it is really diverse in its usage,” he said.

According to Young, the city is pushing to open up waterfront access to the public. “It will change the dynamic, because right now you don’t have anything, you have no say over what goes on and this is really going to change that,” he noted.

Fast Action Needed
Avella said he wants to move the rezoning process along as quickly as possible because there is currently no way to stop developers from swooping in now before the zoning laws are changed.

“There’s a very legal issue here because we have had a number of conversations with my colleagues and other elected officials to try to stop the developers, once they see this coming, from rushing in,” Avella said. “Right now there is no legal method to do that and if we did, they could sue us.” He added that once a developer gets the foundation in, before the zoning goes into effect, they could build under the current laws.

There has been debate as to whether the creation of more restrictive zoning would bring down property values.
“It doesn’t really bring down the value,” Avella said. The only study that has been done evaluated historic districts, as they relate to property values, and similar neighborhoods that do not have that protection. The study showed that the property values in historic districts rise higher and faster than those districts that are not protected, Avella said.

“In my personal opinion, in the long run, property values will continue to rise at a faster rate in neighborhoods that are downzoned because if you are spending $700,000 to $800,000, you want to know that you are protected from having a monster next to you,” Avella said. “In the short term, if you sold to a developer rather than another home owner, you might get a little more from a developer. I have talked to a number of real estate agents and you might get a little more, but for the most part, the developer is not going to give you the financial benefit, it is for them.”

And quality of life? “Most people are concerned with the quality of life rather than the difference in the money. They want the neighborhood preserved and they live here for a reason,” Avella said.

Why Change?

Enforcement has been a sore spot for the City Department of Buildings, which has freely admitted that it does not have the manpower to enforce its own rules. With a backlog of 12,000 complaints, Avella and others have touted rezoning as a way for residents to be better informed before making complaints.

“The Department of Buildings is the most incompetent and corrupt agency in the history of this city and it is about time that something be done,” Avella said last week. “On the left hand, we are changing the zoning and on the right hand, the department doesn’t enforce it, so it is something that we are really concerned with in the Council and, one way or another, the Department of Buildings is going to have to change its attitude.”

[Feature Archives]