Queens Tribune
 
....October 13, 12:52 PM
 
 
   
Fourth Lane Killed: State DOT Nixes Possibility Of LIE Expansion In Latest Study

Construction, like this along the Whitestone Expressway, could still be carried out to replace bridges.

By MICHAEL REHAK

Imagine the possibility of driving on the Long Island Expressway in either direction from the Van Wyck to the Cross Island and having the luxury of an additional lane.
Keep dreaming.

Although extensive traffic studies of the six-mile stretch of highway have included options that would construct an HOV lane or a fourth general use lane in each direction, the idea was publicly shot down Wednesday, as the agency found neither to be a viable option that should be explored.

“Right now, we are only focusing on ramp and safety improvements on the LIE,” said state Department of Transportation spokeswoman Lisa Kuhner. “This includes extending acceleration and deceleration lanes in this area, which will assist cars from safely entering and exiting the Long Island Expressway.”

She said adding lanes “is not a viable option.”

A Sordid Past
For four years, state Sen. Frank Padavan (R-Bellerose) fought the DOT’s proposal to bring the HOV lane into the borough, citing that it would have cut into homeowners’ properties.

Padavan had support from then-Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Gov. George Pataki, former Borough President Claire Shulman and others. The DOT backed out after settling on a lawsuit in which Padavan acted as the plaintiff. The DOT was left to redesign ramps and interchanges.

Bubbling Up
The idea of the HOV lanes percolated a bit this week when Bayside’s Community Board 11 settled down for a short fall meeting.

East Bayside Homeowner Association President and CB11 Board Member Frank Skala was going to have to miss the meeting, but wanted the board to know that his group was opposed to the HOV or new lane construction.

At the meeting, CB 11 voted to tell the DOT to go ahead with any proposed studies, other than the HOV concept.

Members were not aware, at the time, that a number of the studies had already been performed and that two contentious options, the HOV and a fourth lane, were already off the table.

The Options
After examining traffic patterns and other data, the DOT devised five options for handling the highway renovation.
The first, known as the No-Build option, would simply involve inspecting pavement, replacing lines and repairing cracks, joint sealing and drainage. In addition it would repaint and repair bridge overpasses. This wouldn’t cost more than the regular maintenance of the highway.

The second option, Alternative 1, involves what is referred to as the “3R Project,” which includes resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation. This would add to the no build scenario and would include resurfacing the highway, rebuilding shoulders and replacing signs, signals and guardrails. Total cost: $24 million.

Alternative 2 improves traffic and safety operations. Bridges would be replaced and made to accommodate auxiliary lanes. There would also be improved signing, lighting, speed change lanes and signal timing. This option goes further than the previous two, but no designs have been constructed, according to DOT. Total cost: $134 million.

The first of the excluded options is the addition of the fourth lane, which is Alternative 3. This includes the construction of a general use lane in each direction between the Van Wyck and the Cross Island. Total cost: $365 million.

Alternative 4, also taken off the table, would be the construction of an HOV lane. This is similar to Alternative 3, but the new lanes would be HOV rather than for “General Use.” Total cost: $409 million.

Alternative 5 would add a fourth lane between the Clearview Expressway and the Cross Island, plus it would include the improvements of Alternative 2. It has also been taken off the list of options. Total cost: $249 million.

Water Rate Hike Town Hall Meeting

FDNY Implements New Dispatch System

Two Arrested In Internet Sting

Hit-And-Run Driver Turns Himself In

Media Piracy Penalties Stiffened

Budget Halts College Services

Classic Picasso Prints On Display

Harassed Tenants Building Support

Treatment Lessens Side Effects

Youth Baseball Conflicts Queens

Mets And Amazing Schools:

City Announces Rockaway Ferry

30th Candidates Squabble Over Details

Water Board Blasted For Rate Hike

Supermarket Stiffs Baggers

Katz Has Baby Boy

New Bank Offers Loans To The Poor

Senate Approves Summer Gas-Tax Suspense

Queens Inaugurates Its Jazz Orchestra

New Treatment Battles Epilepsy

City Provides Youth With Summer Jobs

Queens Air Gets an ‘F’ Report Says

Acquittals Cap Dramatic Bell Trial

 
 

East of the Cross Island drivers enjoy four lanes and an HOV lane in Nassau County. Tribune photo by Ira Cohen

Major Upheaval
Skala said he clearly remembers 50 years ago when the LIE first laid concrete in Queens – and he is just as against any additions now as he was then.

“When they built the LIE, it was five years of noise, dirt, annoyance and congestion,” said Skala. “The people who lived next to it were furious.”

During the construction period of any expansion project local residents would be most affected, Skala said.
“It would force traffic off the expressway down to Northern Boulevard or to cross streets like Union Turnpike,” Skala said.

Mixed Messages
Other CB11 board members were unsure of the DOT’s intentions and transportation chairman Bernie Haber said the DOT was simply looking for feedback.

After meeting with the CB11 transportation committee, Haber said there were no objections to studying, “but don’t bother with the HOV Lanes because of the court order,” referring to Padavan’s lawsuit.

The HOV Lane concept was still studied, according to Kuhner because all options have to be considered, regardless of legal action.

Traffic Is Changing
According to DOT traffic numbers between 1993 and 2004, the average daily use on the LIE between the Cross Island and the Van Wyck has changed dramatically.

Traffic volumes between Main Street and Kissena Boulevard and Utopia Parkway have risen from 151,900 in 1993 to 183,100 per day in 2004. At the Main Street exit, daily volume has increased from 117,900 in 1993 to 147,500 in 2004.

Not all the volume has increased, however.

At Springfield Boulevard, the average daily traffic rate dropped to 103,000 in 2004 from 151,000 in 1997. At the exit for the Clearview Expressway, however, the numbers are not consistent at all. In 1993 there were 157,800 trips a day. That jumped to 175,200 in 1999, dropped to 104,500 in 2001, and then rose to 126,400 in 2004.

Is This The End?
Though the HOV and extra lanes have been removed as options, studies will continue to be performed regularly as the DOT assesses its future development of highways in and around Queens.

Kuhner did not exclude the possibility of new lanes some day, noting that “It’s an alternative that could happen” some time in the future, though she was adamant that it is off the table for now.

For Padavan, he hopes it is gone for good.
“I don’t want to do it again,” he said.

[Feature Archives]